Título : |
Meal-Related Glycemic Trend Information to Assist Bolus Decision-Making in People with Type 1 Diabetes |
Tipo de documento : |
documento electrónico |
Autores : |
Carlos Esteban Builes Montaño, Autor ; Lema Pérez, L., Autor ; Álvarez, L., Autor ; García Tirado, J., Autor |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Títulos uniformes : |
ScienceDirect
|
Idioma : |
Inglés (eng) |
Palabras clave : |
Diabetes mellitus; Computer Simulation; Mathematical model; Simulation; Decision
support systems; Training |
Resumen : |
Carbohydrate counting is an essential skill of type 1 diabetes therapy. However, this method is based on individual estimates and is prone to errors. Moderate-to-large estimate errors may lead to postprandial hyperglycemia (carbohydrate underestimation) or hypoglycemia (carbohydrate overestimation), both undesired therapy side effects. In this manuscript, we present an analysis of the prediction ability of a decision support system that uses a mathematical model representing the main organs involved in glucose metabolism to simulate the glycemic trends of meals about to be eaten. This decision support system aims to reinforce mindful eating and sharpen the user's informed decision-making process regarding meal bolus. We use data from 5 participants (continuous glucose monitoring, food intake, and insulin records) from a previous study for comparison purposes (ClinicalTrials.govNCT03859401). Mean absolute error and mean absolute relative difference were computed to assess the prediction ability of the proposed method. Limits of agreement for the readings were obtained using a non-parametric approach. Finally, a clinical assessment was conducted using an error grid analysis. Compared to the CGM data, the mean absolute error was 15.32 ± 23.02 mg/dL with a mean absolute relative difference of 10.12%. 95% of the differences were inferior to 50 mg/dL. The accuracy of the model as per the grid analysis was high, with more than 99% of the readings falling in the safe zones (A or B). The presented method paves a new way to improve carbohydrate counting and help people with diabetes manage meal uncertainty. The method will be tested in a subsequent clinical study. |
Mención de responsabilidad : |
C. Builes Montaño, L. Lema Perez, H. Alvarez, J. Garcia Tirado |
Referencia : |
IFAC-PapersOnLine Volume 58, Issue 24, 2024, Pages 321-326 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : |
10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.11.057 |
Derechos de uso : |
CC BY-NC-ND |
En línea : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896324021840 |
Enlace permanente : |
https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_dis |
Meal-Related Glycemic Trend Information to Assist Bolus Decision-Making in People with Type 1 Diabetes [documento electrónico] / Carlos Esteban Builes Montaño, Autor ; Lema Pérez, L., Autor ; Álvarez, L., Autor ; García Tirado, J., Autor . - 2024. Obra : ScienceDirectIdioma : Inglés ( eng)
Palabras clave : |
Diabetes mellitus; Computer Simulation; Mathematical model; Simulation; Decision
support systems; Training |
Resumen : |
Carbohydrate counting is an essential skill of type 1 diabetes therapy. However, this method is based on individual estimates and is prone to errors. Moderate-to-large estimate errors may lead to postprandial hyperglycemia (carbohydrate underestimation) or hypoglycemia (carbohydrate overestimation), both undesired therapy side effects. In this manuscript, we present an analysis of the prediction ability of a decision support system that uses a mathematical model representing the main organs involved in glucose metabolism to simulate the glycemic trends of meals about to be eaten. This decision support system aims to reinforce mindful eating and sharpen the user's informed decision-making process regarding meal bolus. We use data from 5 participants (continuous glucose monitoring, food intake, and insulin records) from a previous study for comparison purposes (ClinicalTrials.govNCT03859401). Mean absolute error and mean absolute relative difference were computed to assess the prediction ability of the proposed method. Limits of agreement for the readings were obtained using a non-parametric approach. Finally, a clinical assessment was conducted using an error grid analysis. Compared to the CGM data, the mean absolute error was 15.32 ± 23.02 mg/dL with a mean absolute relative difference of 10.12%. 95% of the differences were inferior to 50 mg/dL. The accuracy of the model as per the grid analysis was high, with more than 99% of the readings falling in the safe zones (A or B). The presented method paves a new way to improve carbohydrate counting and help people with diabetes manage meal uncertainty. The method will be tested in a subsequent clinical study. |
Mención de responsabilidad : |
C. Builes Montaño, L. Lema Perez, H. Alvarez, J. Garcia Tirado |
Referencia : |
IFAC-PapersOnLine Volume 58, Issue 24, 2024, Pages 321-326 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : |
10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.11.057 |
Derechos de uso : |
CC BY-NC-ND |
En línea : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896324021840 |
Enlace permanente : |
https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_dis |
|  |