Inicio
Detalle del título uniforme
PharmacoEconomics - Open
Tipo de obra :
Autre
Naturaleza de la obra :
Oeuvre
|
Documentos disponibles con este título uniforme (1)
Clasificado(s) por (Año de edición descendente) Refinar búsqueda
Cost effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis in Colombia / Fabián Juliao Baños
Título : Cost effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis in Colombia Tipo de documento : documento electrónico Autores : Fabián Juliao Baños, Fecha de publicación : 2022 Títulos uniformes : PharmacoEconomics - Open Idioma : Inglés (eng) Resumen : Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of tofacitinib versus other treatment options currently available in Colombia in naïve to biologics (first-line) and exposed to biologics (second-line) patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: A Markov model was constructed with 8-week cycles, simulating a cohort of patients in a 5-year time horizon. The health states included remission, treatment response, active UC, and colectomy. The transition probabilities for the induction and maintenance phase were obtained from a network meta-analysis, and effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Unit costs were derived from official national sources. Results: For first line, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was $883 for tofacitinib and $3619 for infliximab, compared with adalimumab. Sensitivity analysis showed that tofacitinib is cost effective in 45% of the iterations, adalimumab in 5%, and infliximab in 50%. Meanwhile, the ICER of adalimumab was $14,927 compared with tofacitinib in second-line treatment. In the sensitivity analysis, tofacitinib was cost effective in 64% of the iterations, followed by adalimumab in 36%. Infliximab and golimumab were not included due to data limitations in the network meta-analysis of second-line treatment. Conclusion: The analysis suggests that in Colombia, treatment with tofacitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe UC is a cost-effective option in both lines compared with other treatment options. Mención de responsabilidad : Fabio Gil, Fabian Juliao-Baños, Luisa Amador, Natalia Castano & Juan Manuel Reyes Referencia : Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):837-846. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1007/s41669-022-00360-4 PMID : 35943702 En línea : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41669-022-00360-4 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6083 Cost effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis in Colombia [documento electrónico] / Fabián Juliao Baños, . - 2022.
Obra : PharmacoEconomics - Open
Idioma : Inglés (eng)
Resumen : Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of tofacitinib versus other treatment options currently available in Colombia in naïve to biologics (first-line) and exposed to biologics (second-line) patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: A Markov model was constructed with 8-week cycles, simulating a cohort of patients in a 5-year time horizon. The health states included remission, treatment response, active UC, and colectomy. The transition probabilities for the induction and maintenance phase were obtained from a network meta-analysis, and effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Unit costs were derived from official national sources. Results: For first line, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was $883 for tofacitinib and $3619 for infliximab, compared with adalimumab. Sensitivity analysis showed that tofacitinib is cost effective in 45% of the iterations, adalimumab in 5%, and infliximab in 50%. Meanwhile, the ICER of adalimumab was $14,927 compared with tofacitinib in second-line treatment. In the sensitivity analysis, tofacitinib was cost effective in 64% of the iterations, followed by adalimumab in 36%. Infliximab and golimumab were not included due to data limitations in the network meta-analysis of second-line treatment. Conclusion: The analysis suggests that in Colombia, treatment with tofacitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe UC is a cost-effective option in both lines compared with other treatment options. Mención de responsabilidad : Fabio Gil, Fabian Juliao-Baños, Luisa Amador, Natalia Castano & Juan Manuel Reyes Referencia : Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):837-846. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1007/s41669-022-00360-4 PMID : 35943702 En línea : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41669-022-00360-4 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6083 Reserva
Reservar este documentoEjemplares(1)
Código de barras Número de Ubicación Tipo de medio Ubicación Sección Estado DD001930 AC-2022-091 Archivo digital Producción Científica Artículos científicos Disponible