2 búsqueda de la palabra clave 'Reproducibility of Results'

Reproducibility of a protocol for standardized reading of chest X-rays of children household contact of patients with tuberculosis / Lina Marcela Cadavid Álvarez ; Lucila Beatriz Molinares Arevalo    

Público ISBD Título : Reproducibility of a protocol for standardized reading of chest X-rays of children household contact of patients with tuberculosis Tipo de documento : documento electrónico Autores : Lina Marcela Cadavid Álvarez, ; Lucila Beatriz Molinares Arevalo, Fecha de publicación : 2022 Títulos uniformes : BMC Pediatrics Idioma : Inglés (eng) Palabras clave : Tuberculosis  Pulmonary  Latent Tuberculosis  Clinical Protocols  Radiography  Thoracic  Observer Variation  Reproducibility of Results Resumen : Background: The interpretation of the chest radiograph may vary because it depends on the reader and due to the non-specificity of findings in tuberculosis (TB). We aim to assess the reproducibility of a standardized chest radiograph reading protocol in contacts of patients with pulmonary TB under the 5 years of age. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study with children under the age of five, household contacts of patients with confirmed pulmonary TB from Medellín, Bello and Itagüí (Colombia) between Jan-01-2015 and May-31-2016. Standardized reading protocol: two radiologists, blinded independent reading, use of template (Dr. Andronikou design) in case of disagreement a third reading was performed. Kappa coefficient for intra and inter observer agreement, and prevalence ratio were estimated of sociodemographic characteristics, TB exposure and interpretation of chest X-ray. Results: From 278 children, standardized reading found 255 (91.7%) normal X-rays, 10 (3.6%) consistent with TB, and 13 (4.7%) other alterations. Global agreement was 91.3% (Kappa = 0.51). Inter-observer agreement between readers 1-2 was 90.0% (Kappa = 0.59) and 1-3 93.2% (Kappa = 0.59). Intra-observer agreement for reader 1 was 95.5% (Kappa = 0.86), 2 84.0% (Kappa = 0.51), and 3 94.7% (Kappa = 0.68). Greater inter-observer disagreement was between readers 1-2 for soft tissue density suggestive of adenopathy (4.6%), airspace opacification (1.17%) and pleural effusion (0.58%); between readers 1-3 for soft tissue density suggestive of adenopathy (4.2%), opacification of airspace (2.5%) and cavities (0.8%). Conclusions: Chest radiographs are an affordable tool that contributes to the diagnosis of TB, so having a standardized reading protocol showed good agreement and improves the reproducibility of radiograph interpretation. Mención de responsabilidad : María Margarita Lozano-Acosta, María Alejandra Rubiano-Arenas, Lina Marcela Cadavid, Guillermo Vélez-Parra, Beatriz Molinares, Diana Marcela Marín-Pineda, María Patricia Arbeláez-Montoya & Dione Benjumea-Bedoya Referencia : BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 24;22(1):307. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1186/s12887-022-03347-6 PMID : 35610599 Derechos de uso : CC BY En línea : https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-022-03347-6 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6082 Reproducibility of a protocol for standardized reading of chest X-rays of children household contact of patients with tuberculosis [documento electrónico] / Lina Marcela Cadavid Álvarez, ; Lucila Beatriz Molinares Arevalo,  . - 2022. Obra : BMC Pediatrics Idioma : Inglés (eng) Palabras clave : Tuberculosis  Pulmonary  Latent Tuberculosis  Clinical Protocols  Radiography  Thoracic  Observer Variation  Reproducibility of Results Resumen : Background: The interpretation of the chest radiograph may vary because it depends on the reader and due to the non-specificity of findings in tuberculosis (TB). We aim to assess the reproducibility of a standardized chest radiograph reading protocol in contacts of patients with pulmonary TB under the 5 years of age. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study with children under the age of five, household contacts of patients with confirmed pulmonary TB from Medellín, Bello and Itagüí (Colombia) between Jan-01-2015 and May-31-2016. Standardized reading protocol: two radiologists, blinded independent reading, use of template (Dr. Andronikou design) in case of disagreement a third reading was performed. Kappa coefficient for intra and inter observer agreement, and prevalence ratio were estimated of sociodemographic characteristics, TB exposure and interpretation of chest X-ray. Results: From 278 children, standardized reading found 255 (91.7%) normal X-rays, 10 (3.6%) consistent with TB, and 13 (4.7%) other alterations. Global agreement was 91.3% (Kappa = 0.51). Inter-observer agreement between readers 1-2 was 90.0% (Kappa = 0.59) and 1-3 93.2% (Kappa = 0.59). Intra-observer agreement for reader 1 was 95.5% (Kappa = 0.86), 2 84.0% (Kappa = 0.51), and 3 94.7% (Kappa = 0.68). Greater inter-observer disagreement was between readers 1-2 for soft tissue density suggestive of adenopathy (4.6%), airspace opacification (1.17%) and pleural effusion (0.58%); between readers 1-3 for soft tissue density suggestive of adenopathy (4.2%), opacification of airspace (2.5%) and cavities (0.8%). Conclusions: Chest radiographs are an affordable tool that contributes to the diagnosis of TB, so having a standardized reading protocol showed good agreement and improves the reproducibility of radiograph interpretation. Mención de responsabilidad : María Margarita Lozano-Acosta, María Alejandra Rubiano-Arenas, Lina Marcela Cadavid, Guillermo Vélez-Parra, Beatriz Molinares, Diana Marcela Marín-Pineda, María Patricia Arbeláez-Montoya & Dione Benjumea-Bedoya Referencia : BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 24;22(1):307. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1186/s12887-022-03347-6 PMID : 35610599 Derechos de uso : CC BY En línea : https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-022-03347-6 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6082

Reserva

Reservar este documento

Ejemplares(1)

Código de barras	Número de Ubicación	Tipo de medio	Ubicación	Sección	Estado
DD001929	AC-2022-090	Archivo digital	Producción Científica	Artículos científicos	Disponible

Documentos electrónicos

AC-2022-090 Adobe Acrobat PDF

Systematic review of the literature on reproducibility of the interpretation of renal biopsy in lupus nephritis / Mauricio Restrepo Escobar ; Paula Andrea Granda Carvajal ; Fabián Alberto Jaimes Barragán  

Público ISBD Título : Systematic review of the literature on reproducibility of the interpretation of renal biopsy in lupus nephritis Tipo de documento : documento electrónico Autores : Mauricio Restrepo Escobar, ; Paula Andrea Granda Carvajal, ; Fabián Alberto Jaimes Barragán, Fecha de publicación : 2017 Títulos uniformes : Lupus Idioma : Inglés (eng) Palabras clave : Biopsy  nephritis  reliability  renal lupus  reproducibility of results  systematic review Resumen : Objective: Before using a test, it should be determined whether the results are reliable. The reliability of the interpretation of renal biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis has not been clearly elucidated. Our objective was to estimate inter and intraobserver reliability of the histological classification, as well as activity and chronicity indices in renal biopsy of patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature, which included articles in any language, using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Search terms included were: reproducibility, reliability, agreement, systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Comparative studies with any design were included, regardless of the year or the language of publication. Two investigators, independently, screened the literature published in accordance with pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: We found 13 relevant studies. Inter-observer reproducibility of most measurements was moderate or low, despite the fact that, in most cases, the readings were made by expert nephropathologists. There was great diversity among designs, participants, including samples and outcomes evaluated in different studies. Although there are too many reports on the clinical use, studies evaluating the reliability of classifications on renal biopsy in lupus nephritis are rare. The quality of the methodological design and reporting was fair. Conclusion: The interpretation of renal biopsy in lupus nephritis is poorly reproducible, causing serious doubts about its validity and its clinical application. As it can lead to serious diagnosis, treatment and prognosis errors, it is necessary to intensify research in this field. Mención de responsabilidad : M Restrepo-Escobar, P A Granda-Carvajal, F Jaimes Referencia : Lupus. 2017 Dec;26(14):1502-1512. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1177/0961203317706556 PMID : 28441914 En línea : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0961203317706556 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4048 Systematic review of the literature on reproducibility of the interpretation of renal biopsy in lupus nephritis [documento electrónico] / Mauricio Restrepo Escobar, ; Paula Andrea Granda Carvajal, ; Fabián Alberto Jaimes Barragán,  . - 2017. Obra : Lupus Idioma : Inglés (eng) Palabras clave : Biopsy  nephritis  reliability  renal lupus  reproducibility of results  systematic review Resumen : Objective: Before using a test, it should be determined whether the results are reliable. The reliability of the interpretation of renal biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis has not been clearly elucidated. Our objective was to estimate inter and intraobserver reliability of the histological classification, as well as activity and chronicity indices in renal biopsy of patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature, which included articles in any language, using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Search terms included were: reproducibility, reliability, agreement, systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Comparative studies with any design were included, regardless of the year or the language of publication. Two investigators, independently, screened the literature published in accordance with pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: We found 13 relevant studies. Inter-observer reproducibility of most measurements was moderate or low, despite the fact that, in most cases, the readings were made by expert nephropathologists. There was great diversity among designs, participants, including samples and outcomes evaluated in different studies. Although there are too many reports on the clinical use, studies evaluating the reliability of classifications on renal biopsy in lupus nephritis are rare. The quality of the methodological design and reporting was fair. Conclusion: The interpretation of renal biopsy in lupus nephritis is poorly reproducible, causing serious doubts about its validity and its clinical application. As it can lead to serious diagnosis, treatment and prognosis errors, it is necessary to intensify research in this field. Mención de responsabilidad : M Restrepo-Escobar, P A Granda-Carvajal, F Jaimes Referencia : Lupus. 2017 Dec;26(14):1502-1512. DOI (Digital Object Identifier) : 10.1177/0961203317706556 PMID : 28441914 En línea : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0961203317706556 Enlace permanente : https://hospitalpablotobon.cloudbiteca.com/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4048

Reserva

Reservar este documento

Ejemplares(1)

Código de barras	Número de Ubicación	Tipo de medio	Ubicación	Sección	Estado
DD000648	AC-2017-037	Archivo digital	Producción Científica	Artículos científicos	Disponible